February 20, 2006

Bitter Smile

Unlike everyday, I started my day looking at a picture of a beautiful Iraqi woman wearing a traditional Iraqi dress. As usual, Iraqis start their days with pictures of explosions, people running, a woman weeping, a child crying, a group of people shot dead and so on. This morning was different; they started the day with this beautiful smile which they miss a lot.
The picture showed a young Iraqi model putting on a beautiful Arabic traditional dress, Galabiya, with golden decorations. This model’s picture was taken yesterday during the opening of the Iraqi folkloric fashion show sponsored by the Iraqi culture ministry. “Wow! It’s weird. I thought I will see either a picture of a bombing or something like that,” I said to O. I cheered up and was so delighted to see a picture of a woman with a beautiful smile, a smile that is almost missing due to the daily suffering in an occupied and destroyed country.

I have to say that the daily pictures I see everyday makes me so sad and increase my pain to watch my country destroyed. But today, this picture changed my mood. I kept staring at it and thought about how we are far from happiness and smile to the extent I found this picture strange.

Now, back to reality!
Before the U.S.-led invasion, media in Iraq was not free. Newspapers, TV channels and radio stations flourished since then. Journalists become free to express reality of the situation without praising a leader or a specific party. However, these journalists did not expect their job to be one of the most dangerous and did not expect their newly “liberated” country would be the most dangerous.

Since 2005 to the meantime,
the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), a New York-based nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to defending press freedom worldwide, published the names of the journalists who were killed since the invasion in 2003. The CPJ said that the number of the Iraqi journalists killed in 2005 and 2006 reached 23, 22 in 2005 and 1 in 2006. Anchors, cameramen, reporters, editors, news producers and directors are all subjected to the danger of the US forces and the widespread insurgents who do not believe in freedom of writing.

As a reporter, I’ve been at risk in Baghdad and other provinces several times. Working for an Iraqi media means something but working for US media means something else! As an Iraqi reporter working with a US media, I am considered a “spy”, “collaborator” or sometimes an “infidel” in the eyes of the insurgents who said have the “right” to kill me as I broke the rule of “true Islam” and become a “spy to the infidels”, which is nonsense.

At any scene, nothing is guaranteed. The journalist, whether foreigner or Iraqi, is subjected to different kinds of danger. U.S. and Iraqi forces are always hostile to journalists at scenes, mostly those of explosions. They have the “right” to shoot you in the head if they just “suspect” you.
For instance, Waleed Khalid, 35, a soundman for Reuters, was shot by U.S. forces several times in the head and chest as he drove with cameraman Haidar Kadhem to investigate a report of clashes between armed men and police in Baghdad's al-Adil neighborhood, Reuters reported. However, I believe the main danger facing journalists in Iraq comes from insurgents. Iraqi journalists fall victims to revenge attacks by insurgents, mostly Sunni groups who do not let Iraqis work with foreigners, especially with Western news media. And those who murder journalists usually go unpunished.

So far, I haven’t heard any journalist was killed by Iraqi police. They just do not cooperate with journalists at scenes. Once, I was covering an explosion targeted a Church in Baghdad, I was shooting some photos and taking notes form the scene. Suddenly, an Iraqi policeman yelled at me and then he and other policemen handcuffed me despite my screams that I am a journalist. They did not care and were about to confiscate my camera till I convinced them to release me by deleting the pictures I’ve got.

Since I started working, I have been so cautious in telling people where I work. No one in my neighborhood knows what I do. If so, I would be finished in a minute as I live in a very dangerous neighborhood where three young men were killed just because insurgents discovered where they worked. When I leave my house, I look right and left to make sure no stranger is following me or monitoring me from distance. The same thing happens when I go back, which is always late at night. I said it previously that I had told my parents not to open the door if someone comes late. Instead, I go and open it incase someone wants to shoot me. I’d rather be killed instead of watching my parents be killed in front of me. Also, people started to ask. My neighbors are bothering my family by asking about me and why I don’t show up in the neighborhood as I used to be. My barber noticed that I did not show up for a month and a half. Well, of course, I was in the US at that time but do I dare to tell him this? I have to say that I am being cautious, but the question is: is this enough?!

Is that it? Of course, not. I have to mention that it is not only the journalist who faces danger; it is his driver, his interpreter and even his cook as well! Several drivers and interpreters of journalists were either threatened or killed just because they work for journalists. Few days ago, a driver working for a western media was shot dead in the middle of the street near his house in Baghdad. The security situation is getting worse day after day. No serious efforts are made to maintain security in the country. I know Iraqi police and army are doing their utmost efforts to control the situation, but this is not enough. People should cooperate with them to get rid of the dirty things that entered and destroyed our beautiful country. Journalists should be backed up not left unsecured. They have to speak out the truth that some people in the outside world don’t want to listen to it.

7 Comments:

  1. "U.S. and Iraqi forces are always hostile to journalists at scenes, mostly those of explosions."

    If you were to see one of your buddies get killed or mutilated I don’t think you would be very receptive to seeing some guy snapping away pictures of the carnage. The same holds true for the Iraqi police.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BT, why do you think the insurgents target journalists? I know that seems like a dumb question, but it seems that for the most part journalists "help" the cause of the insurgents. I don't mean that they do it on purpose or are sympathetic to them (that's another debate), but the nature of the news business seems to favor them.

    It's the old "if it bleeds it leads" adage- it's in the insurgents' interest to make the world believe all is lost in Iraq through a constant barrage of front page violence stories. I believe it's called the "daily boom boom". The reality of modern news marketing is that a non-violent story, like a powerplant opening or something, will be shown on page 7 of the paper (if at all). Page 8 if Jessica Simpson does something. A "successful" insurgent attack - one that causes many deaths or injuries - will be given incredible free publicity by the news. So, you'd think the insurgents would go out of their way to keep you safe. Why do you think they don't? Does it suit their purposes to control you through fear as well? Do they hope to control the information coming out of Iraq so much that the only info circulating is jihadi websites and propaganda (i.e. Jubasquatch)?

    Anyway, stay safe!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi PJ,
    I know and I really understand this feeling. I was attacked by a man who lost a brother in a car bomb. He was about to kill me. I understood his feeling and left immediately. However, photographers and journalists are assigned to do their job and no more than that and that was what I was doing at the scene. My job was to reveal to the world what is happening.

    Whether a soldier or a policeman is killed is something hurtful but if the journalist or photographer does not reveal this to the world, there would be no one to feel sorry or horrified by this. Right? There would be no people to think that these soldiers or policemen or whoever is doing something. I hope you got my point. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am happy that there are still some things to smile about and hope there will soon be more! keep pluggin away.

    ReplyDelete
  5. RhusLancia,

    “why do you think the insurgents target journalists?”

    I think there are many reasons for that:
    • Most insurgents are believed to be illiterate.
    • Most of them were deceived by the fact that any non-Muslim is an “infidel”. That’s why they kidnap foreign journalists and may kill them.
    • It is strongly believed that most insurgents kidnap western and Iraqi journalists to ask for ransom. They use this money to get supplies and weapons to carry out their operations.
    • Some insurgents do not want to show the world what kind of crimes they are doing.
    • There is a political issue here. They do not want to make Iraq a safe place for westerners, including journalists, and others to come and work and invest.

    “it seems that for the most part journalists "help" the cause of the insurgents.”

    Umm. That’s not completely true. I have to admit that some news agencies focus on what they call it “heroic” side of insurgents for many reasons, for instance the agency’s policy is anti-war. So they consider what insurgents do is “resistance” and they mix all the papers and consider criminal insurgents as “resistance” and that’s not good in my own point of view. Journalists should be unbiased.

    “It’s in the insurgents' interest to make the world believe all is lost in Iraq through a constant barrage of front page violence stories.”

    [sigh] that’s right. I always believe that newspapers look for or let’s say stress on disasters more than positive things. I believe that the real and good efforts are neglected by western media. However, if you read local newspapers, you may find articles talking about reconstruction and donations, for example, but this is not tangible. That’s why you find people upset, depressed and disappointed because even the good things they read about in their newspapers have not been achieved.

    “Does it suit their purposes to control you through fear as well? Do they hope to control the information coming out of Iraq so much that the only info circulating is jihadi websites and propaganda (i.e. Jubasquatch)?”

    I think you are right. Their main purpose is to control journalists. However, I believe they won’t be able because journalists in Iraq are improving and becoming brilliant being more free. I think despite what insurgents are doing, journalists will not stop because the journalist’s role is no less than the doctor and the professor. They work to make a change and I hope this change is to create a better future.

    ReplyDelete
  6. treasure of baghdad,
    please stay safe...after all people like you are the treasure of baghdad and we need you there!

    ReplyDelete
  7. You have identified the problem in one sentence.

    Almost.

    "People should cooperate with them to get rid of the dirty things that entered and destroyed our beautiful country"

    But the real truth is: There are many "dirty things" that were there all along and are Iraqi.

    Call them Iraqi, Arabs, insurgents, terrorists, thugs, criminals or whatever, they were there, have been there and will remain there until they are exposed, turned in and killed or arrested.

    No one can do that except other Iraqis, and they SHOULD be the ones to do it.

    You must defend Iraq from enemies from within and from without. All within Iraq must live by the rule of fair and just laws.

    Until you do, Iraq will not be able to survive, let alone prosper.

    Papa Ray
    West Texas
    USA

    ReplyDelete